functional.cafe is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
functional.cafe is an instance for people interested in functional programming and languages.

Server stats:

217
active users

Public

Boosts apprec:

Do I have anybody in my social graph who’s vision-impaired enough to be the target of alt-text?

Realtalk: in 2025, is manual alt text (of OCR-able images, I mean) by humans still a necessary thing that we should be enforcing aggressive social pressure around? /=

(It feels a little stupid, if random non-specialized-accessibility tooling like consumer phone operating-systems now have near-perfect OCR. I'm not a user of the tools that _are_ specialized for accessibility, but I imagine that they're even more cutting-edge, and have been OCR'ing at least that well for several years now?)

But, like, I also recognize that I’m not in the target market, there. So where are we? Somebody catch me up. Is this Mastodon culture of alt-text-enforcement just cargo-culting at this point, or does it still have a purpose?

Public

@ELLIOTTCABLE Wait, how does OCR obviate the need for alt text? Not all images are OCR-able screenshots of text.

(Personally I often use a terminal client that only loads images in ASCII-art-like rendering; and sometimes the vagaries of federation mean that images don't load, but the alt text does.)

Public

@nev yah, I tried to edit the OP, but I don't think I examined my own assumptions very well. To me, but apparently not everyone else, ‘describe images w/o text in them’ is just an obvious necessity for all consumers - and I always read the aggressive fediverse “you MUST alt ALL the things!!!" as an cover-the-other-bases, accessibility-focused mantra.

My question basically applies to images like this one: functional.cafe/@ELLIOTTCABLE/

Trying to describe the contents of a screenshot just feels so pointless, and like a turn-off to usage of the fediverse; but I see _so_ many accounts with something like "I will unfollow you if you post any images without alt-text.”

It feels like cargo-culting, and I want to check that assumption/feeling of mine against someone with actual experience as the target-market of these things.

Public

@ELLIOTTCABLE

A few years ago I (fully sighted) was invited to a discussion on accessibility for people who are blind or have low vision. While Ontario has disability programs to provide assistive devices, they prescribe specific technologies, often years out-of-date. So while there might be new technology that can OCR text-only images, people using ODSP (Ontario Disability Support Program) often can't use it or afford it.

TL;DR: Always provide AltText even for text-only images.

Public

@bobjonkman this is useful information, and an angle I had not considered. Thank you.