Elsevier rant, long, f-word
Elsevier now confirms the submission of the copyright form¹ by sending you an E-mail with an HTML attachment called Order Confirmation.html. What’s inside? A two-section document, the second section having the title “Order Confirmation” and, among others, the fields: “Order number” and “Order date”.
Fuck you Elsevier! I’m not buying shit, I’m publishing a fucking paper!
Some colleagues refuse submitting or reviewing papers to Elsevier journals. As an early career researcher, I find it difficult to do because I have multiple colleagues exploited by Elsevier, and I do need to maintain good karma in my relationship with them. However, since interacting with this “publisher” gets worse and worse over time, I am seriously considering losing some karma points.
¹ Publishers in academia very often ask us to waive some of our rights over the article to them so that they can freely handle the profit they get from selling our works to the libraries of our own institutions. We, the authors, are paid nothing for our work. We, the reviewers, are paid nothing for our work. We are supposed to be just happy with the fact that our articles get “published” behind paywalls and with lots of restrictions prohibiting us from actually sharing our papers freely.
I've just created a nice dark #Emacs theme. It is called "stock defaults for dark background" and looks amazingly nice.
(set-face-attribute 'default nil :background "gray5" :foreground "gainsboro")
(set-face-attribute 'mode-line nil :background "gray15" :foreground "gainsboro")
I just started using #NitterizeMe and it's great. A useful enhancement would be redirecting direct nitter.net links to the user's chosen nitter instance because at least for me/my location, nitter.net itself loads horrible slow (like ten seconds or more to view a single tweet).
Können Menschen bitte aufhören, auf freier Software rumzuhaten, wenn sie nicht für iOS implementiert wurde? Man kann doch nicht ernsthaft erwarten, dass sich Menschen dafür einen Apple-Rechner + Smartphone kaufen, 180€ für den Zugang zum Apple-Store bezahlen, Swift lernen und darin die App komplett neu implementieren und sich dann mit den Regularien von Apple rumschlagen. Das ist in Tool-Diskussionen einfach unfair. Leute, euch in ein Gefängnis einzukaufen, war eure Entscheidung
I want to make Linux more accessible to everyone, but also make the complicated and ever growing field of distros easier to understand.
That's the goal or my new project, Try Linux.
We have computed the very first chosen-prefix collision for SHA-1. To put it in another way: all attacks that are practical on MD5 are now also practical on SHA-1.
We have reduced the cost of a collision attack from 2^64.7 to 2^61.2, and the cost of a chosen-prefix collision attack from 2^67.1 to 2^63.4.
Demo: The legacy branch of GnuPG (version 1.4) is vulnerable. We have created two PGP keys with different UserIDs and colliding certificates.
Consider: millions of years ago our antecedents gave a massive sacrifice of their left hemisphere.
We lost a tremendous amount of short term memory and replaced it with Broca’s, Wernicke & the phonological loop.
So we can—talk.
Thus chimpanzees can do this—we can’t:
#Sonos is evil. They have a “recycle mode” that bricks your device on purpose and makes sure they can never be used again. Pure software. Even though speakers are perfectly OK. This should be illegal. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1210662988828442624.html
It is proven! I am tsdh on Keybase: https://keybase.io/tsdh/sigchain#c899990036b3dde0a17e2fdf2860358bb35a58d424c7e576aa0b7e592513d6670f
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!