Follow

@sir What alternatives could you suggest? IRC is text-only and primitive and Matrix is slow and I haven't yet seen a client with decent UX. I haven't used Zulip or Mattermost yet, I've only heard of them.

@phoe @sir
I've tried Zulip and it works pretty well.
But when your servers go down, you need some chat that is _not_ on your server to coordinate the response.

@phoe @sir The fact that IRC is text-only (though there's an updated spec in the making) is not a handicap but a feature.

IRC + mailing lists (with archives). When you put the facts on the table, there's nothing better.

@slp @phoe @sir
Then please put these facts on the table. I only have intuition that IRC+email is better, but no arguments I could use to convince other people...

@slp @sir @phoe mailing lists are great, sure. but IRC lacks message history. should i stay on IRC 24/7 or deal with this fuckery with chat logs?

@moderator @slp @sir Or have an IRC bot that collects logs, and pray that it does not have any downtime.

@phoe @moderator @slp tools like irccloud make this easy. And it's more likely than not other people have their own logs to help build a full picture if some bot goes down. But here's the real answer:

It's not a big deal if you miss some of the conversation.

@sir @slp @phoe to me it's still quite uncomfortable to go to separate page and look for the logs. i'd rather choose to talk via XMPP and if you don't want useless crap such as images and stuff, you can just don't use unneeded extensions

@moderator @sir @phoe Important stuff must go via mailing list, where is archived in a way friendly to search engine crawlers.

You can easily find threads of LKML or *BSD just by searching on DuckDuckGo. Losing that due to the use of Slack or Discord is a *huge* loss, but we'll only be conscious about that in 3-5 years.

@moderator @slp @phoe I hardly ever need to reference logs. How often do you actually need to? The rest of the time is just catching up on shit you didn't need to see anyway

@sir @slp @moderator @phoe
We had some reason to start publishing logs. I don't really agree with it being useful for all cases, but our project leader had some reasons for it.

Being able to disconnect and not expect people to be connected 24/7 in the network might be a challenge for some younger people or people who got used to history synchronization.
I find it liberating. If I'm not online, I'm not online.

@wysteria @phoe @moderator @slp missing the conversation doesn't make it hard to work. If your input is needed on something then someone will ping you when you're online. Obsessively reading the entire backlog is nuts

@wysteria @phoe @moderator @slp a backlog doesn't really help lurkers. It's not lurking if you just read 10 lines of backlog and start talking. Lurking involves sitting there and watching the chat for a while.

@phoe IRC is king, text-only is a feature not a bug

@sir @slp Of course it's a feature - unless you want to chat with someone who isn't a complete and total developer nerd like me or you and wants standard contemporary features like automatic image uploads, conversation threads, channel history, or if you want to build a community of non-technological people around your software. At that point, I observed that people prefer to leave rather than stay on IRC.

Or they start Discord servers of their own.

@phoe

I'm sympathetic to those concerns.

With IRC trollspamming finally endemic on many FOSS-associated networks & subsequent need for nick registration, the very low barrier-to-entry of IRC which was a trade-off against more intricate feature sets is gone.

@sir @slp

@phoe

That said, there are many choices which provide more features, but retain IRC's end-to-end freedom.

@sir @slp

@phoe @sir @slp

whichever is used by a project, my take is that it should be bridged to IRC at the very least.

@deejoe @phoe @sir @slp I wrote an IRC bridge for Potato. Sadly, not enough people were interested in a free Slack alternative to make that project viable.

It's a pity, since it worked perfectly fine, was self-hosted and had features that Slack still lacks (for example, the ability to implement bots that push custom HTML in replies).

@deejoe @phoe @slp more features are the opposite of what we need

@sir

yes, I've seen how you cherish such an expansive & welcoming "we"

@phoe @slp

@deejoe @phoe @slp who pissed in your coffee & asprin mug this morning

@sir

I don't know, but, see, it's afternoon here, and there's this guy in the timeline being all shouty, who then gets all knee jerk & sarcastic even with folks who support some his points.

But nah, that couldn't be it, could it?

@phoe @slp

@deejoe @phoe @slp right, let me know when Slack stops making your register too

@sir

you know, you really don't have to get in my face with that shit

i don't fucking use slack

@phoe @slp

@deejoe @phoe @slp well slack is what we're fucking talking about pal

@sir

so, you're here to promote slack, then?

if not, then maybe we're also talking about something else too

@phoe @slp

@phoe @sir The original toot was talking about FOSS projects, so I'm assuming most people involved have a technical background.

Also, with the proper tools, IRC isn't hard to use at all.

@slp @sir Yep - my case is perhaps a little bit more specific. I want a means of collaborating with people who are both deeply technical and deeply non-technical, and also includes most (or at least some) of the features I have listed above. When it comes to programming, I'm eager to nerd all over Freenode, but when it comes to collaborating with non-technerds, I'm looking for something more featureful, or the community will go set up a Discord server anyway.

@phoe @slp I reject this idea that non-nerds *need* features. It makes no sense. More features is more difficult to comprehend.

@sir @slp @phoe what about designers? i'm not actually one of them myself so i may be wrong but i'm pretty sure they won't refuse to have features such as image sharing and stuff

@moderator @slp @phoe some IRC clients like The Longue support inline images etc

@sir @phoe @slp

yet: if everynerdy did that, nerds would be dead within a few decades entirely.

nobody's born a nerd. people don't learn in a vacuum. some people need people contact to learn, or pictures, or whatever.

if you're not volunteering to teach, that's understandable -- I refuse too -- but from someone with severe learning problems, I can tell you accessible isn't just cheap hardware

it's unicode, screenreaders, pictures, text-to-speech, and sometimes people contact

just saying ❤️

@sir @phoe @slp

(plus, technically speaking, that's a broader form of the 640k mistake, in a sense: "nobody 'needs' more than text!" well, okay, but 'nobody' disagrees pretty strongly and there's evidence suggesting that not all people can learn effectively and quickly from pure text, too. :\ )

@sydneyfalk @phoe @slp I disagree. 90% of modern nerds were raised on text. They somehow figured it out. You know computers had text-only interfaces *before* they had raster interfaces, right?

@sir @phoe @slp

I cut my teeth on Doom, son. ;) I'm aware. And I flailed desperately for years and years, mostly due to my learning defects and low tolerance for frustration.

This is also arguably an example of the "well X was just fine why would we Y"? We didn't go to the moon for years and years, said people during the space race -- why bother now? It's a waste of money, yeesh.

Nobody knows what lies beyond their space if they refuse to innovate past what they are already comfortable with.

@sydneyfalk @phoe @slp I'm not making a general argument here, just refuting your idea that nerds would die out if we used text-only interfaces. They wouldn't.

@sir @phoe @slp

If you're using lynx right now to toot things, I will literally accept that you literally believe this.

Especially if you don't have a smartphone (which was decried as 'dumbed down' computing by some, IIRC).

Otherwise, I'm going to assume you believe it in some sense, in a "well I had to so they have to" sense. And I'm gonna tell you, as someone who thought that way a long time: It doesn't move forward. It is stationary.

It is, long-term, quite unhelpful. (IMO, obviously.)

@sir @phoe @slp

And no, "Nerds" won't die. Your concept of them, though, could -- things that refuse to maintain or grow die, and fertilize the things that are willing to grow. The "old guard" of "real" techs, or whatever this concept is; yes, they'll function. But as a slim minority at best. It's endless meta-November forever, all the way down.

This is meant as food for thought, assuming people are looking for that.

Anyway: Be well. ^_^

@sir @phoe @slp

(oh, and I forgot: I don't think I actually said that they'd die? I was saying they'd be excluding people that might be interested, and if they're doing it out of "well fuck you" issues, then it's probably illogical and unnecessary. since logic is more important than feelings under all circumstance, it'd probably be logical if the old guard passed on their stuff, however they can, to people who can use it after they're in the ground.)

@sir @phoe @slp

(correction, upon rereading, I did say that. it was maybe 20% hyperbolic, but yes, I did technically say that. my mistake, and please, accept my apology for the error.)

@sydneyfalk @phoe @slp not to mention that IRC is by FAR the most accessible chat medium, if you're going to drop the text-to-speech into this discussion

@phoe @sir @slp the new ircv3 tags try to bring these features to IRC, while keeping it as it were before. attached is a screenshot of the message-reply IRCv3 tag draft demoed in irccloud.

@xinayder @sir @slp I've had no idea that IRC is being extended like that. Thanks!

@sir @phoe @slp it's up to the client to display replies to a specific message. I just hope that this kind of "modernization" doesn't impact the true essence of IRC.

@xinayder @phoe @sir @slp IRCcloud is an absolute rip off of a product tbh

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Functional Café

functional.cafe is an instance for people interested in functional programming and languages.