“Indoor transmission of SARS-CoV-2” contains potentially groundbreaking discoveries, but is apparently not peer-reviewed. Anyone more knowledgeable than me has an opinion on the article?
@otini why do you think they are groundbreaking (authors claim results were expected)?
@kmicu Well I've never heard of them, and the French government puts a lot of emphasis on wearing masks in public places nowadays, and according to the results it is not necessary
@kmicu in outdoor public places, I mean. The risk seems negligible in that case.
@otini roger. Personally I see paper’s measurements touching only a narrow topic. There’s also a social impact from normalizing wearing masks and situations when ‘I only went outdoor and forget about mask but now I want to pop into a shop (indoors) just for a second, what’s the harm’ and similar. So even though paper states that spread outdoors is minimal (when maintaining a distance) I don’t see that as a sufficient analysis of the multidimensional topic.
Not a domain expert so safely ignore 😺
@otini (Basing a policy on a paper using data reported by Chinese gov can be difficult to defend too, but that’s more of a political issue.)
@kmicu That seems wise, yeah.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!