@woozle It's a very opinionated thing, and clearly not everybody agrees with the opinions of the main developer here.
I fully agree with you by the way, and 500 characters is so arbitrary. It's as if the thinking was that Twitter is a perfect kind of interactions, just that the posts are ever so slightly too short.
The easiest solution is to move to Glitch which is a fork of Mastodon which changes this, as well as adds some really useful features such as markup. Since it's a Mastodon fork, it's compatible which means that migration is rather simple.
@loke We migrated toot.cat to Glitch last year -- and yes, it's definitely an improvement. I also upped our limit to 1000.
I'm just really questioning why there's a need for a limit at all, on any instance. (Yet to be determined: does Glitch allow removing the limit altogether, or do you have to set it to some arbitrarily high limit? I'm sure ash has told me, but I don't remember.)
@clacke @woozle That is true. But This instance was limited to 500 characters for a long time, and there were plenty of times where that just wasn't enough. I think right now, I often exceed 500 chars on a regular basis, often reaching slightly above.
It's just much less stressful to have to constantly think of the character count all the time.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!