@max @sir I'd say "generics" ((type-)parametric structures/modules) is an important feature, although somewhat complex.
Being small and simple is an advantage, but only among the systems with roughly equivalent functionality. And there are languages/systems even simpler and smaller than it, yet more powerful.
@veer66 @amiloradovsky @max my concern is that this doesn't feel like a Go feature to me. Go has this awsome habit of sitting quietly on contentious features like generics for a while so all of the smart people involved in Go can have a good think on it, then finally coming out with an industry-shaking elegant solution to the problem. Go modules are a great example: it was shit for a long time and then a solution was found which puts every other dependency management solution to shame. I want to see the same thing happen for generics, and I'm prepared to wait as long as necessary for the right design to be found
functional.cafe is an instance for people interested in functional programming and languages.